Skip to main content
South Dakota is a strict corporate practice of dentistry state: the statute makes management, ownership, and operation of the entity through which dentistry is offered the exclusive responsibility of licensed dentists, with a short exception list.
South Dakota’s rules come from SDCL ch. 36-6A and Board of Dentistry regulation. Check the legislation tracker for pending changes.

1. CPOD status

Tier: Strict SDCL 36-6A-31 reserves the practice vehicle to dentists: “Only a dentist licensed … may practice as a dentist … Dentists have the exclusive responsibility for: … (9) The management, ownership, or operation of a business, corporation, organization, or entity through which dentistry … is offered or provided to the public.”1 The current text traces through SL 1981 ch. 275 § 11, SL 1992 ch. 269 § 23, SL 2005 ch. 200 § 2, and the 2015 recodification (SL 2015 ch. 199 § 30), which modernized the chapter while keeping the dentist-exclusivity structure.1 The formulation is “exclusive responsibility” rather than a “deemed practicing” clause, but it functions as an unlicensed-practice net over lay owner-operators. Related: SDCL 36-6A-30 makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor for unlicensed persons to sell, offer, provide, or advertise any dental service.2 Exceptions in SDCL 36-6A-33 include community health centers and FQHCs, nonprofit mobile programs, educational programs, and state and federal institutions.3

2. Other professions

This page covers dentistry only. Medicine, optometry, veterinary practice, and other professions are governed by different statutes and boards, even within the same state. For medical-practice sources, use the MSO-PC Wiki.

3. Professional entity forms

Dental entities are governed by SDCL ch. 47-12. A corporation, LLC, limited partnership, LLP, or LLLP may be used, but every director, manager, member, partner, and shareholder must be a licensed dentist or a qualifying all-dentist entity (§§ 47-12-1, -3). No ownership, control, or voting proxy may be given to an unqualified person. The entity needs a Board certificate before opening or operating (§ 47-12-7). The application identifies the entity’s name, address, state of organization, EIN, and owners/managers and carries a 100fee;thenonassignablecertificatemustbepostedandalocationchangereportedwithin10days(§47128).RenewalisdueeachJuly1witha100 fee; the nonassignable certificate must be posted and a location change reported within 10 days (§ 47-12-8). Renewal is due each July 1 with a 25 fee, and late registration is automatically suspended (§ 47-12-12). Also confirm before filing:
  • Naming rules, designator requirements, and any limits tied to licensed owners’ names; several states regulate dental trade names separately
  • Board pre-approval or certificates, whether the dental board must act before (or after) the secretary of state will file
  • Officer and director licensure, including states that restrict these roles as well as ownership to licensees
See PC vs PLLC vs PA and Form a professional corporation.

4. Fee structure

SDCL 36-6A-39 makes it a Class 2 misdemeanor to divide professional fees or pay a commission to a dentist or other person who sends or refers patients. The text excepts entities under ch. 47-12, partnerships, and employee compensation. Section 36-6A-59.1(14) separately makes the conduct unprofessional or dishonorable. This is a referral-fee prohibition rather than an express ban on every percentage MSA, but it must be analyzed alongside § 36-6A-31(9)‘s reservation of management, ownership, and operation to dentists. For the MSA, test whether a percentage-of-collections fee is permitted under the state’s dental, fee-splitting, referral, tax, and contract rules. Several states expressly restrict revenue-linked dental management fees, and the Aspen Dental settlements imposed related party-specific terms. Flat and cost-plus formulas are not automatic safe harbors; the services, calculation, amount, control rights, and actual payments still matter. See Fee-splitting rules and Set the management fee.

5. Noncompetes

Dentist noncompetes in South Dakota are governed by the state’s general restrictive-covenant law. Verify current enforceability with counsel before drafting one. Federal noncompete policy changed substantially in 2025 and 2026. The FTC’s Non-Compete Rule was vacated, the agency dismissed its appeals in September 2025, and the rule was removed from 16 C.F.R. pt. 910 effective February 12, 2026. State law remains central. Dental enforcement resolutions in New York and California have also restricted noncompetes for the settling parties as a corporate-practice remedy. Verify the current rule, worker, agreement type, transaction context, effective date, and remedy in this state. See the legislation tracker.

6. DSO-specific law and registration

South Dakota has no support-organization registration statute. The dental-entity certificate under ch. 47-12 applies to the clinical entity, not the DSO. A DSO supports a dentist-owned, Board-registered practice entity and must comply with § 36-6A-31(9), which reserves management and operation as well as ownership.

7. Death and transition window

SDCL 36-6A-33(15) permits the estate or agent of a deceased or substantially disabled dentist to contract with or employ a dentist to manage the practice for up to 24 months until sale or closure. If the practice uses a ch. 47-12 entity, also address § 47-12-13(3), which permits the Board to condition, limit, suspend, or revoke the entity certificate on the death of the last licensed member, partner, or shareholder. Build both rules into the succession documents.

8. Practical structuring notes

“Management” is on the reserved list. South Dakota’s § 36-6A-31(9) expressly assigns management, ownership, and operation of the professional entity to licensed dentists. Map each delegated service and approval right against that text; do not rely on the agreement’s “support” label if its operative provisions transfer a reserved function.

9. Verification checklist

  • Confirmed the permitted entity form for dentistry in this state
  • Confirmed whether dental board pre-approval or a certificate is required before filing
  • Confirmed whether officers and directors must be licensed dentists
  • Confirmed the management fee structure is lawful here, including any restriction on revenue-linked fees
  • Clinical carve-out drafted against this state’s current statutory language, including any enumerated control prohibitions
  • Transfer restriction and succession documents checked against this state’s death-transition window
  • Noncompete provisions checked against current state law
  • DSO foreign-qualified before it has employees here
  • Any DSO registration, licensure, or disclosure obligation identified and calendared
  • Trade-name and advertising-disclosure rules for dental practices checked

10. Sources and where to verify

Entity formation runs through the South Dakota Secretary of State; board rules through the South Dakota Board of Dentistry; pending bills through the South Dakota Legislature. For the cases and statutes referenced above, see DSO & dental case law and the 51-jurisdiction table. For enacted and pending legislation, see the dental legislation tracker.
Last modified on August 21, 2026