Skip to main content
Kansas is a strict corporate practice of dentistry (CPOD) state with one of the country’s earliest named DSO regimes: a corporate-practice ban, dentist-only ownership with a 20% owner-presence rule and office caps, mandatory DSO registration with the Kansas Dental Board (K.S.A. 65-1470), and statutory limits on what a dental services agreement may control (K.S.A. 65-1471).
Kansas’s rules come from the dental practice act and Kansas Dental Board regulation. The Kansas Dental Association’s 2025 legislative priorities include defending the 20% in-office rule, which indicates possible repeal efforts. Check the legislation tracker for pending changes.

1. CPOD status

Tier: Strict, with express DSO registration and agreement restrictions
  • K.S.A. 65-1425: corporate-practice ban. Except through the professional corporation law (K.S.A. 17-2706 et seq.), “no corporation shall practice, offer, or undertake to practice or hold itself out as practicing dentistry.” Narrow exceptions cover a dentist employed by another dentist, state institutions, employer-run nonprofit employee clinics, and general hospitals in counties under 50,000.
  • K.S.A. 65-1435: practice under the licensee’s own name. Two or more dentists may associate “each as owners” in a PC or LLC and employ non-owning licensees. The owner-dentist must be personally present in the office operating as a dentist at least 20% of the time patients are being treated. Expansion is capped at two dental offices in addition to the primary office, subject to geographic and population conditions. Pull the full text before quoting the radius and county-size requirements.
  • K.S.A. 65-1424(a)(3): defines an “unlicensed proprietor” as a person or entity not authorized to own or operate a dental practice whose agreement with a dentist permits interference with professional judgment or violates the act. A dentist who enters such an arrangement faces license limitation, suspension, or revocation.
The doctrine dates to Winslow v. Kansas State Board of Dental Examiners, 115 Kan. 450, 223 P. 308 (1924). Later authorities cite it for the rule that a corporation may not practice dentistry, although the judgment was reversed and remanded on its facts.

2. Other professions

This page covers dentistry only. Medicine, optometry, veterinary practice, and other professions are governed by different statutes and boards, even within the same state. For medical-practice sources, use the MSO-PC Wiki.

3. Professional entity forms

Permitted forms: professional corporation under K.S.A. 17-2706 et seq. or LLC under the Kansas revised LLC act, owned by licensed dentists (K.S.A. 65-1435, 65-1425). Non-owner dentists may be employed. Ownership: dentists only. A hygienist or lay employer would be a “proprietor” or “unlicensed proprietor” under K.S.A. 65-1424. Also confirm before filing:
  • Naming rules, designator requirements, and any limits tied to licensed owners’ names; several states regulate dental trade names separately
  • Board pre-approval or certificates, whether the dental board must act before (or after) the secretary of state will file
  • Officer and director licensure, including states that restrict these roles as well as ownership to licensees
See PC vs PLLC vs PA and Form a professional corporation.

4. Fee structure

K.S.A. 65-1471 constrains control rather than prescribing fee mechanics. No Kansas provision located for this page bans percentage-of-collections fees by name. The “unlicensed proprietor” definition turns on whether an agreement permits interference with professional judgment, so MSA economics that function as proprietorship may trigger the rule. Verify the fee structure with Kansas counsel. For the MSA, test whether a percentage-of-collections fee is permitted under the state’s dental, fee-splitting, referral, tax, and contract rules. Several states expressly restrict revenue-linked dental management fees, and the Aspen Dental settlements imposed related party-specific terms. Flat and cost-plus formulas are not automatic safe harbors; the services, calculation, amount, control rights, and actual payments still matter. See Fee-splitting rules and Set the management fee.

5. Noncompetes

No dental-specific noncompete statute was identified in this research; Kansas noncompetes are governed by general state law. Verify current Kansas law with counsel before including one. Federal noncompete policy changed substantially in 2025 and 2026. The FTC’s Non-Compete Rule was vacated, the agency dismissed its appeals in September 2025, and the rule was removed from 16 C.F.R. pt. 910 effective February 12, 2026. State law remains central. Dental enforcement resolutions in New York and California have also restricted noncompetes for the settling parties as a corporate-practice remedy. Verify the current rule, worker, agreement type, transaction context, effective date, and remedy in this state. See the legislation tracker.

6. DSO-specific law and registration

Kansas regulates DSOs by name and by function under L. 2011, ch. 114, effective June 9, 2011:
  • K.S.A. 65-1470, registration. Any non-dentist person or entity (other than a dentist-owned PC or LLC) that contracts with a dentist to provide dental office administrative services must register with the Kansas Dental Board. The filing identifies the company, contact, responsible person, addresses, and dentist practice-owners. Register within 30 days after executing the contract, report changes within 30 days, and keep copies of all administrative-services contracts available for board inspection during business hours. See Register a DSO.
  • K.S.A. 65-1471, contract limits. No agreement may give anyone other than a licensed dentist control over (1) dental treatment, (2) accepting patients, (3) direction or delegation of professional services, (4) ownership of dental charts and patient records, (5) ownership of dental equipment and materials, subject to a lease and financing exception in subsection (d), or (6) supervision of clinical staff. Subsection (c) permits purchasing, billing, tax, compliance and QA, legal, payroll, advertising, training, recruiting, recordkeeping, and programming services performed “under the direction or with the consent or approval of a licensed dentist.” Subsection (e) bans indemnification clauses for acts that violate the dental act.
  • K.S.A. 65-1424(a)(2): defines a “dental franchisor” to include specified management consulting, marketing, branding, or equipment-placement arrangements. A franchisor becomes an “unlicensed proprietor” if its agreement permits interference with the dentist’s professional judgment.

7. Death and transition window

Under K.S.A. 65-1424(b), the estate or agent of a deceased or substantially disabled dentist may employ dentists for up to 18 months from death or disability while the practice is sold or closed. On a showing of good cause, including a good-faith effort to sell or close, the board may grant six-month extensions for up to one additional year, for a total of 30 months.

8. Practical structuring notes

The 20% presence rule and the two-additional-office cap in K.S.A. 65-1435 constrain multi-site dentist-owned groups. A single friendly dentist cannot serve as a nominal owner for a large Kansas footprint because the statute requires the owner to practice in each office for one-fifth of treating hours and limits the number of additional offices. Use practicing owner-dentists, register the DSO on time, and draft the MSA against the six § 65-1471 control restrictions and the subsection (c) service permissions.

9. Verification checklist

  • Confirmed the permitted entity form for dentistry in this state
  • Confirmed whether dental board pre-approval or a certificate is required before filing
  • Confirmed whether officers and directors must be licensed dentists
  • Confirmed the management fee structure is lawful here, including any restriction on revenue-linked fees
  • Clinical carve-out drafted against this state’s current statutory language, including any enumerated control prohibitions
  • Transfer restriction and succession documents checked against this state’s death-transition window
  • Noncompete provisions checked against current state law
  • DSO foreign-qualified before it has employees here
  • Any DSO registration, licensure, or disclosure obligation identified and calendared
  • Trade-name and advertising-disclosure rules for dental practices checked

10. Sources

For the cases and statutes referenced above, see DSO & dental case law and the 51-jurisdiction table. For enacted and pending legislation, see the dental legislation tracker.
Last modified on August 21, 2026