Prerequisites
- The management services agreement (MSA) and full agreement stack
- Board minutes for both entities
- Bank account signer and access lists for every entity
- Actual compensation plans for every dentist and hygienist, rather than only a policy summary
- Org chart showing who employs whom
- Marketing materials, signage photos, and the website
- Your state’s page in DSO laws by state
The audit
Score each item Pass / Concern / Fail. Any Fail is a remediation item with an owner and a date.1. Employment
2. Dental records
3. Clinical authority
4. Money
In re OCA treated bank-account authority as one important part of the overall control analysis. OCA controlled the operating account, and the orthodontists could not withdraw their own funds.1 Review account authority alongside the other agreements and operating practices.5. The fee
6. Compensation and production management
Compensation and performance-management records receive close attention in dental enforcement. Kool Smiles clinics “pressured and incentivized dentists to meet production goals” through discipline and cash bonuses,7 and Samson Dental Partners settled an allegation that it violated Indiana’s corporate-practice law “by rewarding production, disciplining employees for not meeting production objectives, and directing personnel in a manner which compromised clinical judgment.”87. Assets, premises, and the statutory definition
Some states define owning or operating a dental office as the practice of dentistry. Texas reaches a person who “owns, maintains, or operates an office or place of business” that engages another to practice dentistry. North Carolina uses the terms “owns, manages, supervises, controls or conducts.”3 Test the full arrangement against the text in each state.8. Governance and formalities
9. The friendly dentist
10. Trade name and public presentation
Dentistry’s corporate-practice doctrine grew out of storefront advertising dentistry, which is why trade names and holding out are regulated alongside ownership.11. State filings and new laws
12. Medicaid utilization, if you take it
Include program-integrity controls in the review even though they are not strictly part of a corporate-practice test. Dental False Claims Act matters have combined management-control allegations with Medicaid utilization issues, and a 2013 Senate report asked HHS to consider corporate-practice evasion as a program-integrity concern.12Scoring and remediation
1
Score every item
2
Triage the Fails
3
Assign an owner and a date to each remediation item
4
Document the remediation, not just the finding
A finding with no recorded fix is worse than no audit.
5
Re-audit annually, and immediately on any state law change
The one-question version
If you do nothing else:If your state’s dental board reviewed the full agreement stack and actual operations, what evidence would show that the dentists retain the authority state law requires?The second answer is the losing fact pattern, per In re OCA.1 If the honest answer is “the board would say the DSO runs everything,” you have a structure that exists until someone looks at it.
Verify it worked
- All twelve sections scored, counsel involved in scoring and remediation
- Privilege question addressed before starting
- Clinical compensation and performance measures reviewed under current state and federal law, using the actual plans rather than only policy summaries
- Bank answers verified against the signer lists, not the MSA’s recitals
- Asset, lease, and records answers checked against the state’s statutory definition of practicing dentistry
- Trade name and advertising reviewed against state disclosure and registration rules
- DSO registration filed where required, renewal calendared
- Medicaid utilization monitoring running, with clinical review of outliers documented
- Every Fail has an owner and a date; remediation documented
- Next audit calendared
Sources
- In re OCA, Inc., 552 F.3d 413 (5th Cir. 2008). Opinion; CourtListener.
- Packard v. OCA, Inc., 624 F.3d 726 (5th Cir. 2010). Opinion.
- Tex. Occ. Code § 251.003(a)(4) (definition) and § 256.001 (third-degree felony), applied in In re OCA (n.1); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-29(b)(11).
- K.S.A. 65-1471 (contract limits: treatment, patient acceptance, records, equipment, clinical-staff supervision).
- NRS 631.215 (Nevada percentage-fee ban); 21 NCAC 16X .0101 (PDF) (North Carolina). New York and New Jersey treatment per the state pages in DSO laws by state; verify with counsel.
- California AG, settlement with Aspen Dental over corporate practice (May 7, 2026); term detail per DLA Piper, CPOM enforcement alert (July 2026), which also covers the AG’s Art Center Holdings amicus on reserved owner-replacement rights.
- DOJ, Benevis and Kool Smiles clinics pay $$23.9 million (Jan. 10, 2018).
- USAO W.D. Ky., $$5.1 million settlement with Indiana dental firm (Nov. 6, 2018).
- Colo. Dental Board Rule 1.7 under S.B. 25-194 (2025). Dykema, Colorado Dental Board promulgates DSO regulations.
- NY AG, settlement with Aspen Dental Management (June 18, 2015).
- Mississippi Board of Dental Examiners, Regulation 55; 59 O.S. § 328.31.
- Senate Committee on Finance & Sen. Grassley, Joint Staff Report on the Corporate Practice of Dentistry in the Medicaid Program, S. Prt. 113-16 (June 2013).
- HHS OIG, Questionable Billing for Medicaid Pediatric Dental Services: California, OEI-02-14-00480 (May 2015), and companion reports for New York, Louisiana, and Indiana. The full settlement record is collected on the DSO enforcement tracker.